Myths of Mobility as a Service

As the transportation landscape undergoes rapid evolution, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) emerges as a frontrunner in this transformative journey. Yet, amidst its promising potential, misconceptions about MaaS abound, posing barriers to its widespread adoption.

Myth 1: Implementing a new MaaS platform means having to use a separate app, which creates unnecessary duplication. 

✅ Reality: Utilize your current app and enhance it by integrating new functionalities through API integrations or an SDK.

A prevalent misunderstanding regarding MaaS is the belief that it requires developing a completely new app. Contrary to this notion, you can maximize your current app’s potential by incorporating MaaS features using API integrations or Software Development Kits (SDKs). This strategy enables a smooth integration of MaaS functionality without the necessity for a separate application.

Myth 2: Creating a new MaaS platform is perceived as an overwhelmingly large project. 

✅ Reality: Implementation can be done incrementally in phases or comprehensively from the outset.

The idea that rolling out a MaaS platform is a massive endeavor may seem intimidating. Yet, there’s flexibility in starting with modest steps and gradually broadening your capabilities, or diving into a full-scale integration right from the start. The decision hinges on your unique requirements and available resources.

Myth 3: Handling data in a MaaS system is overly complex. 

✅ Reality: MaaS platforms can seamlessly integrate diverse data sources, offering comprehensive insights.

Managing data effectively is pivotal in any MaaS system. Despite the misconception, MaaS platforms are adept at incorporating data from multiple sources, providing cities and operators with a complete view of mobility data. This wealth of data enables informed decision-making and boosts system performance overall.

Myth 4: White-label solutions cannot meet local requirements.

✅ Reality: Modular software components efficiently adapt to local needs.

Local requirements may differ widely, but MaaS solutions can be customized to address them. With modular software components, customization becomes straightforward, enabling your digital mobility strategy to conform to local regulations and preferences seamlessly. This adaptability simplifies the development process.

Myth 5: Existing tools suffice for transport agencies; there’s no need for dedicated tools. 

✅ Reality: A dedicated tool empowers control and data ownership, facilitating informed decisions.

Although current tools may suffice, a dedicated tool offers unique benefits. It provides control and ownership over user-generated data, ensuring consistent visibility for informed decision-making. Tailored to specific requirements, it offers a competitive edge.

❌ Myth 6: Transitioning to MaaS isn’t financially beneficial. 

✅ Reality: MaaS creates new revenue streams and fosters sustainability.

While adopting MaaS may appear costly, it actually presents significant financial opportunities. MaaS introduces additional revenue streams through partnerships and user fees. Moreover, it promotes sustainable practices, resulting in cost savings and long-term financial gains.

Myth 7: Public institutions must lead MaaS to ensure impartial outcomes. 

✅ Reality: Multiple deployment models exist, with transparency as the cornerstone.

While there’s a notion that MaaS should be spearheaded by public institutions for impartiality, there are diverse deployment approaches. Transparency regarding data sources is crucial. Successful MaaS implementations can also result from public-private partnerships and collaborations.

Myth 8: Waiting for other deployments’ outcomes before taking a leading position is prudent.
✅ Reality: MaaS is a proven technology capable of addressing mobility issues today.

Opting for a passive stance and awaiting results from other deployments may lead to missed opportunities. MaaS offers adaptable solutions proven to effectively tackle your unique mobility challenges. Delaying action and waiting for others to lead can impede progress and stifle innovation.

Source: Meep

Leave a Reply